References: Your image belongs to you

.
  1. Letzing J. What is women’s ‘bodily autonomy’ and why does it matter for everyone? [Internet]. Geneva: World Economic Forum; 2025 Mar 3 [cited 2025 Jul 7]. Available from: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/03/what-is-bodily-autonomy-and-why-does-it-matter-for-women/. 

  2. Madden M, Calvin A, Hasse A, Lenhart A. The dawn of the AI era: teens, parents, and the adoption of generative AI at home and school. : Common Sense; 2024.

  3. eSafety Commissioner. Technology-facilitated abuse: family, domestic and sexual violence literature scan. Canberra: Australian Government; 2023.

  4. eSafety Commissioner. Tech trends position statement: generative AI. Canberra: Australian Government; 2023.

  5. Carson D. Children’s agency, images and consent [Internet]. Canberra: The Spoke; 2018 Jul 25 [cited 2025 Oct 21]. Available from: https://thespoke.earlychildhoodaustralia.org.au/childrens-agency-images-consent/. 

  6. Regehr K, Shaughnessy C, Zhao M, Shaughnessy N. Safer scrolling: how algorithms popularise and gamify online hate and misogyny for young people. London: UCL and University of Kent; 2024. 

  7. Koester D, Marcus R. How does social media influence gender norms among adolescent boys? A review of evidence. ALIGN report. London: ODI; 2024.

  8. Reset Australia. Algorithms as a weapon against women: how YouTube lures boys and young men into the ‘manosphere’. Sydney: Reset Australia; 2022.

  9. Haslop C, Ringrose J, Cambazoglu I, Milne B. Mainstreaming the manosphere’s misogyny through affective homosocial currencies: exploring how teen boys navigate the Andrew Tate effect. Social Media + Society. 2024;10(1):1-11. 

  10. Respect Victoria. Strategic plan 2023–2028. Melbourne: Respect Victoria; 2023.

  11. eSafety Commissioner. Position statement: recommender systems and algorithms. Canberra: Australian Government; 2022.

  12. Our Watch. Change the story: a shared framework for the primary prevention of violence against women in Australia. 2nd ed. Melbourne: Our Watch; 2021.

  13. Australian Government. National Plan to End Violence against Women and Children 2022–2032. Ending gender-based violence in one generation. Canberra: Department of Social Services; 2022. 

  14. eSafety Commissioner. eSafety position statement: online harmful sexual behaviours in children and young people under 18. Canberra: Australian Government; 2020. 

  15. Newman P. Harmful sexual behaviours (HSBs) research report. The Hague: Terre des Hommes Netherlands; 2025.

  16. Woodall N. Police investigate sexually explicit deepfake images of students at Gladstone Park Secondary College [Internet]. Australia: ABC News; 2025 Feb 21 [cited 2025 Mar 7]. Available from: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-02-21/gladstone-park-secondary-explicit-deepfakes-students/104965106. 

  17. Hunt G, Higgins D. AI nudes of Victorian students were allegedly shared online. How can schools and parents respond to deepfake porn? [Internet]. The Guardian; 2024 Jun 12 [cited 2025 Mar 7]. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/article/2024/jun/12/ai-nudes-of-victorian-students-were-allegedly-shared-online-how-can-schools-and-parents-respond-to-deepfake-porn. 

  18. Singer N. Teen girls confront an epidemic of deepfake nudes in schools [Internet]. The New York Times; 2024 Apr 8 [cited 2025 Mar 7]. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/08/technology/deepfake-ai-nudes-westfield-high-school.html. 

  19. Jones S. Spain sentences 15 schoolchildren over AI-generated naked images [Internet]. The Guardian; 2024 Jul 10 [cited 2025 Mar 7]. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jul/09/spain-sentences-15-school-children-over-ai-generated-naked-images. 

  20. Dubinski K. Kids call for more lessons on AI after fake nudes posted by London Catholic students [Internet]. CBC News; 2024 Apr 4 [cited 2025 Mar 7]. Available from: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/london/london-ontario-st-thomas-aquinas-sta-deepfake-ai-nude-sexual-imagery-1.7163183. 

  21. Our Watch. Respectful relationships education: a blueprint for preventing gender-based violence through education systems. Melbourne: Our Watch; 2025.

  22. Flynn A, Cama E, Scot AJ. Preventing image-based abuse in Australia: the role of bystanders. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology; 2022.

  23. Walsh K, Mathews B, Parvin K, Smith R, Burton M, Nicholas M, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of online child sexual victimization: findings from the Australian Child Maltreatment Study. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2025;160:107186.

  24. Noble SU. Algorithms of oppression: how search engines reinforce racism. New York: New York University Press; 2018. 

  25. National Office for Child Safety. National Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Child Sexual Abuse 2021–2030. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2021. 

  26. eSafety Commissioner. Mind the gap: parental awareness of children’s exposure to risks online. Canberra: Australian Government; 2022.

  27. Project Rockit. Shaping our feeds: young people’s experiences of social media algorithms. Melbourne: Project Rockit; 2024.

  28. eSafety Commissioner. A new playground: the digital lives of young people with disability. Canberra: Australian Government; 2023.

  29. eSafety Commissioner. Tipping the balance: LGBTIQ+ teens’ experiences negotiating connection, self-expression and harm online. Canberra: Australian Government; 2024. 

  30. Bloemen N, De Coninck D. Social media and fear of missing out in adolescents: the role of family characteristics. Social Media + Society. 2020;6(4):2056305120965517. 

  31. Ging D. Digital culture, online misogyny, and gender-based violence. In: Gallagher M, Montiel AV, editors. The Handbook of Gender, Communication, and Women’s Human Rights. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2023. p. 213-27. 

  32. Recuero R. The platformization of violence: toward a concept of discursive toxicity on social media. Social Media + Society. 2024;10(1):1-9.

  33. Diepeveen S. Hidden in plain sight: how the infrastructure of social media shapes gender norms. ALIGN Report. London: ODI; 2022. 

  34. Women’s Aid. Influencers and attitudes: how will the next generation understand domestic abuse? Bristol: Women’s Aid; 2023. 

  35. CCDH Quant Lab. The incelosphere: exposing pathways into incel communities and the harms they pose to women and children. Washington, D.C.: Center for Countering Digital Hate; 2022.

  36. Wescott S, Roberts S, Zhao X. The problem of anti-feminist ‘manfluencer’ Andrew Tate in Australian schools: women teachers’ experiences of resurgent male supremacy. Gender and Education. 2024;36(2):167-82. 

  37. Internet Matters. “It’s really easy to go down that path”: young people’s experiences of online misogyny and image-based abuse. London: Internet Matters; 2023. 

  38. Fisher K, Rice S, Seidler Z. Young men’s health in a digital world. Melbourne: Movember Institute of Men’s Health; 2025. 

  39. Baker C, Ging D, Andreasen MB. Recommending toxicity: the role of algorithmic recommender functions on YouTube Shorts and TikTok in promoting male supremacist influencers. Dublin: DCU Anti-Bullying Centre, Dublin City University; 2024. 

  40. eSafety Commissioner. Behind the screen: the reality of age assurance and social media access for young Australians. Canberra: Australian Government; 2025. 

  41. Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2024. 

  42. Renström EA, Bäck H. Manfluencers and young men’s misogynistic attitudes: the role of perceived threats to men’s status. Sex Roles. 2024;90(12):1787-806.

  43. Habib H, Srinivasan P, Nithyanand R. Making a radical misogynist: how online social engagement with the manosphere influences traits of radicalization. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 2022;6(CSCW2):1-28. 

  44. Google; Ipsos. Our life with AI: from innovation to application. Mountain View, California: Google; 2025.

  45. Thorn. Deepfake nudes & young people: navigating a new frontier in technology-facilitated nonconsensual sexual abuse and exploitation. Manhattan Beach, California: Thorn; 2025. 

  46. My Image My Choice. Deepfake abuse: landscape analysis. The exponential rise of deepfake abuse in 2023 – 2024 [Internet]. United States: My Image My Choice; 2024 Feb [cited 2025 Mar 21]. Available from: https://www.canva.com/design/DAGLHpt6WlY/Hfztqtw_-tKza_2l1cPNrA/view?utm_content=DAGLHpt6WlY&utm_campaign=designshare&utm_medium=link&utm_source=editor. 

  47. Security Hero. 2023 state of deepfakes: realities, threats and impact [Internet]. United States: Security Hero; 2023 [cited 2025 Mar 7]. Available from: https://www.securityhero.io/state-of-deepfakes/

  48. Henry N, Umbach R. Sextortion: prevalence and correlates in 10 countries. Computers in Human Behavior. 2024;158:108298.

  49. Umbach R, Henry N, Beard GF, Berryessa CM. Non-consensual synthetic intimate imagery: prevalence, attitudes, and knowledge in 10 countries.  In: Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; Honolulu, HI, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2024. 

  50. Flynn A, Powell A, Scott AJ, Cama E. Deepfakes and digitally altered imagery abuse: a cross-country exploration of an emerging form of image-based sexual abuse. The British Journal of Criminology. 2022;62(6):1341-58. 

  51. Internet Matters. The new face of digital abuse: children’s experiences of nude deepfakes. London: Internet Matters; 2024. 

  52. Internet Watch Foundation. What has changed in the AI CSAM landscape? Cambridge, UK: Internet Watch Foundation; 2024.

  53. Ofcom. Deepfake defences: mitigating the harms of deceptive deepfakes. London: Ofcom; 2024. 

  54. Australian Federal Police. Submission No 2 to Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, Criminal Code Amendment (Deepfake Sexual Material) Bill 2024. Canberra: Parliament of Australia; 2024. 

  55. Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill 2024. 

  56. eSafety Commissioner. eSafety’s consultation on the social media age restrictions. Canberra: Australian Government; 2025.

  57. eSafety Commissioner. Image-based abuse. National survey: summary report. Canberra: Australian Government; 2017.

  58. Attorney-General’s Department. Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. Final report: volume 10, children with harmful sexual behaviours. Canberra: Australian Government; 2017.

  59. Wolbers H, Cubitt T, Napier S, Cahill MJ, Nicholas M, Burton M, Giunta K. Sexual extortion of Australian adolescents: results from a national survey. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology; 2025. 

  60. Ringrose J, Regehr K, Milne B. Understanding and combatting youth experiences of image-based sexual harassment and abuse. London: UCL Institute of Education; 2021.

  61. O’Rourke F, Haslop C. ‘We’re respectful boys … we’re not misogynistic!’: analysing defensive, contradictory and changing performances of masculinity within young men’s in-person and digitally mediated homosocial spaces. Journal of Gender Studies. 2024:1-18. 

  62. Laffier J, Rehman A. Deepfakes and harm to women. Journal of Digital Life and Learning. 2023;3(1):1-21. 

  63. Children’s Commissioner for England. “One day this could happen to me”: children, nudification tools and sexually explicit deepfakes. London: Children’s Commissioner for England; 2025. 

  64. Body Safety Australia. Impact report: annual report 2024. Melbourne: Body Safety Australia; 2024.

  65. Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis: a practical guide. London: Sage; 2021. 

  66. Nominet. More than 2.7m parents share family photos with complete strangers online [Internet]. Oxford: Nominet; 2018 Feb 6 [cited 2025 Jul 11]. Available from: https://nominet.uk/news/more-than-2-7m-parents-share-family-photos-with-complete-strangers-online/. 

  67. Ferrara P, Cammisa I, Corsello G, Giardino I, Vural M, Pop TL, et al. Online “sharenting”: the dangers of posting sensitive information about children on social media. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2023;257:113322. 

  68. Kumar P, Schoenebeck S. The modern day baby book: enacting good mothering and stewarding privacy on Facebook.  In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing; Vancouver, BC, Canada. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2015. p. 1302–12. 

  69. Divon T, Annabell T, Goanta C. Children as concealed commodities: ethnographic nuances and legal implications of kidfluencers’ monetisation on TikTok. New Media & Society. Published online January 19, 2025. 

  70. INHOPE. What are 'kidfluencers? [Internet]. Amsterdam: INHOPE; 2022 Sep 6 [cited 2025 Aug 11]. Available from: https://www.inhope.org/EN/articles/what-are-kidfluencers 

  71. Anciones Anguita K, Checa Romero M. Making money on OnlyFans? A study on the promotion of erotic content platforms on social media and their influence on adolescents. Sexuality & Culture. 2025. 

  72. United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989. 

  73. Crespi I, Scocco M, Palermo M. Gender socialisation and identity formation across generations. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education. 2025;15:46-61. 

  74. Carrasco Rueda AB, González Gijón GM, Martínez Heredia N. Systematic review on gender socialisation in pre-school education. Pedagogía Social. 2023;43:191-204. 

  75. eSafety Commissioner. Digital use and risk: online platform engagement among children aged 10 to 15. Canberra: Australian Government; 2025.

  76. eSafety Commissioner. Levelling up to stay safe: young people’s experiences navigating the joys and risks of online gaming. Canberra: Australian Government; 2024.

  77. Scholes L, Mills KA, Wallace E. Boys’ gaming identities and opportunities for learning. Learning, Media and Technology. 2022;47(2):163-78.

  78. eSafety Commissioner. Being a young man online: tensions, complexities and possibilities. Canberra: Australian Government; 2024.

  79. Hutchinson J, Clement DY, Gheorghe RM, Kellum L, Shuttleworth A. “I’m not super familiar with children’s ecosystems online”: expert assessments on the effects of early childhood exposure to extremism online. Perspectives on Terrorism. 2025;19(1):64-90.

  80. Tanner S, Gillardin F. Toxic communication on TikTok: sigma masculinities and gendered disinformation. Social Media + Society. 2025;11(1):1-12.

  81. Flood M, Dragiewicz M, Pease B. Resistance and backlash to gender equality: an evidence review. Brisbane: QUT Crime and Justice Research Centre; 2018.

  82. Coumarelos C, Roberts N, Weeks N, Rasmussen V. Attitudes matter: the 2021 National Community Attitudes towards Violence against Women Survey (NCAS). Findings for young Australians (Research report, 08/2023). Sydney: Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety; 2023.

  83. Nelson C. “A public orgy of misogyny”: gender, power, media, and legal spectacle in Depp v Heard. Feminist Media Studies. 2025;25(2):233-49.

  84. de Groot T, de Haan M, van Dijken M. Learning in and about a filtered universe: young people’s awareness and control of algorithms in social media. Learning, Media and Technology. 2023;48(4):701-13.

  85. Henry N, Powell A, Flynn A. Not just ‘revenge pornography’: Australians’ experiences of image-based abuse. A summary report. Melbourne: RMIT; 2017. 

  86. Ross J. The idea that online life isn't real is trite—and harmful [Internet]. New York: WIRED; 2015 Oct 20 [cited 2025 Aug 14]. Available from: https://www.wired.com/2015/10/the-idea-that-online-life-isnt-real-is-trite-and-harmful/.

  87. Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation. Online child sexual exploitation: understanding community awareness, perceptions, attitudes and preventative behaviours. Queensland: ACCCE; 2020.

  88. Coumarelos C, Weeks N, Bernstein S, Roberts N, Honey N, Minter K, Carlisle E. Attitudes matter: the 2021 National Community Attitudes towards Violence against Women Survey (NCAS). Findings for Australia (Research report 02/2023). Sydney: Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety; 2023.

  89. Sutton S, Finkelhor D. Perpetrators' identity in online crimes against children: a meta-analysis. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024;25(3):1756-68.

  90. National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. Take It Down [Internet]. National Center for Missing & Exploited Children; 2025. Available from: https://takeitdown.ncmec.org/

  91. Sippy T, Enock FE, Bright J, Margetts HZ. Behind the deepfake: 8% create; 90% concerned. Surveying public exposure to and perceptions of deepfakes in the UK. arXiv Preprint posted Jul 8. 2024.

  92. YouTube. Age-restricted content [Internet]. 2025. Available from: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2802167?hl=en.

  93. Lloyd J, Dembele L, Dawes C, Jane S, Macmillan L. The Australian National Research Agenda to End Violence against Women and Children (ANRA) 2023–2028. Sydney: Australia’s Research Organisation for Women’s Safety (ANROWS); 2023.

  94. Mamié R, Ribeiro MH, West R. Are anti-feminist communities gateways to the far right? Evidence from Reddit and YouTube.  In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021; Virtual event, United Kingdom. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2021. p. 139–47.

  95. Copland SJ. Reddit, the manosphere, and the male complaint [dissertation]. Canberra: Australian National University; 2022.

  96. Respect Victoria. Summarising the evidence: online harassment and abuse against women. Melbourne: Respect Victoria; 2023.

  97. Roose JM, Flood M, Greig A, Alfano M, Copland S. Chapter 3. Representations of masculinity by progenitor groups and extremists.  Masculinity and violent extremism. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 53-91.

  98. Agius C, Cook K, Nicholas L, Ahmed A, Jehangir HB, Safa N, et al. Mapping right-wing extremism in Victoria: applying a gender lens to develop prevention and deradicalisation approaches. Melbourne: Victorian Government and Swinburne University of Technology; 2020.

  99. Macdonald SJ, Donovan C, Clayton J. ‘I may be left with no choice but to end my torment’: disability and intersectionalities of hate crime. Disability & Society. 2023;38(1):127-47.

  100.